March 31, 2010

GDAE Podcast - Episode 29

Can Left & Right Unite?


  • Today's Question: Would it be possible for principled people on the left and right join forces to take on the consolidated power of the status quo?
  • Relfecting on the rising right wing populist movement that gravitated to McCain/Palin rallies in 2008, held tea bag rallies, and disrupted town hall meetings on healthcare.
  • Home grown Music: Voice of a nine-year-old and rough rendition of "Sliding Down"...
  • Prosecute Bush: "Arrest Blair dot Com"... as in British prime minister Tony Blair?



Play Episode 29 from this page:



Click to Download Episode 29.

Previous Episodes & 60-Sec Promo:
GDAE Podcast 60-Second Promo

GDAE Podcast Episode 28 March 7, 2010
GDAE Podcast Episode 27 February 21, 2010
GDAE Podcast Episode 26 February 7, 2010
GDAE Podcast Episode 25 January 19, 2010
GDAE Podcast Episode 24 December 31, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 23 November 29, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 22 November 11, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 21 October 18, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 20 October 9, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 19 September 27, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 18 September 16, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 17 August 31, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 16 July 30, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 15 June 17, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 14 June 10, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 13 May 22, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 12May 5, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 11 April 24, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 10 April 9, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 9March 28, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 8 March 15, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 7 March 1, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 6 February 17, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 5 February 6, 2009
GDAE Podcast Episode 4 January 24, 2009


gdaeman_scroll_small

March 29, 2010

A New Politics

After a discussion about commonalities on the left and right of the political spectrum, a friend of mine summed up a compelling new politics. The "party" of Principled People versus what he called demagogues... it's not about "left" and "right."

Aside: I think he used the term "demagogues" for effect and simply meant "unprincipled" people. Admittedly, on controversial issues the notion of one's "principles" breaks down; the subject of abortion is one such example. But one can recognize principled people who conduct themselves in a fair and honest way.

Today's political situation is in flux and this "new politics," were it to manifest itself in electoral party politics, would be temporary. It would be an instance of moderate elements of the populist left and right asserting control to refresh a corrupted political system. Common people on the left and right recognize the corrupting influence of big money in both legislative and judicial elections.

Other areas of common interest between common people on the left and right include:

Concern about...

  • Consolidation of wealth perpetuated by Wall Street's culture of anything goes .
  • Consolidated control of the mass media
  • Consolidation of corporate control ... Big Business that outsources jobs and makes it impossible for small businesses to compete fairly.... monopolies, cartels, oligopolies.
  • We're concerned with what some call "activist judges"... like those Supreme Court judges who recently decided that corporations should have MORE influence over the political electoral process when the Citizens United case before them should have been decided on more narrow grounds.
  • We share a concern about police brutality

In other words, we share concerns about the consolidation of power among a small sector of our society.

  • We didn't like the bank bailouts that perpetuated this power when we had a chance to put the bankers in their place.
  • We believe in national sovereignty, something we give up with so-called "free trade" agreements written by transnational corporate lawyers.
  • We share opposition to warrantless wire tapping and other privacy invasions of the USA PATRIOT Act
  • We're mutually concerned about the erosion of of Posse Comitatus Act, which places limits on the US military's use of police powers for domestic law enforcement.
  • Similarly, we share concerns about the CIA conducting domestic operations contrary to its founding charter.
  • We share concerns about joblessness and homelessness
  • We share the concern that the two major political parties are increasingly out of touch with real concerns of the people, in part because we recognize they have been captured by a dysfunctional political system corrupted by the consolidated power referenced earlier.

Sources:

GDAE Podcast Episode 29

gdaeman_scroll_small

March 28, 2010

Middle Class

In the news:

For the 50 percent of families in the middle of the scale, household income ranges from $51,000 to $123,000 for a typical four-person, two-parent family.

The median is about $81,000. [half the families make more, half make less].

Median income for a single-parent, two-child family is about $25,000. [mostly women... they're hurting].

Those numbers are from 2008, and have probably fallen 5 to 7 percent since then, on account of the recession.

Sources:

U.S. News March 23, 2010
.

gdaeman_scroll_small

March 21, 2010

High Drama in DC

It's amazing that the healthcare bill, which I'd say doesn't qualify as real "reform," is certainly competing for attention with the NCAA Basketball madness.

It's a difficult calculus. The right-wing, corporate-funded propaganda machine has had an effect. The Obama administration, and Congressman Dennis Kucinich, have felt the effect; "failure" to pass "something," with the potential of loosing the Presidency to the paranoid right wing, was weighing on Kucinich when he decided to vote "yes." I'm guessing he imagined the Sarah Palin wing of the Republican Party taking control if Obama "failed" to pass healthcare and he got scared... can't say I blame hem.

The positives: No more denial of coverage for existing conditions, no more dropping people, parents can keep their kids on their insurance until age 26.

The negatives: YOU MUST BUY HEALTH INSURANCE! YOU MUST give your money to evil health insurance corporations that, with their consolidated wealth, will further entrench their power over Congress and our democracy in the years to come.

*Shrug*? I think we should keep pushing for Alan Grayson's option for anyone who wants to be able to buy Medicare at cost.

Now. Lets turn our attention to reforming the US Senate starting with the frigg'n filibuster.

gdaeman_scroll_small

March 17, 2010

When Frat Boys Rule

A Texan cringes at her college son's contemplation of joining a fraternity. She ponders the history of past frat boys who work their way into the system, in her example,

In my mind, some of those assholes are very likely among the smug bastards sitting on the education commission dictating standards for Texas' text books. They were all particularly jolly when Ronald Reagan came to power - them in their Izods and Topsiders.

She takes some solace in her mother's motherly advice:

"give them enough rope."

True enough, I think.

We gave the pledge bros, who ended up on Wall Street, "enough rope," they drilled the economy into the ground, we bailed them out, and they still continue to spew worn out mantras about "less regulation," "lower taxes," and, get this, "free market"... and the pledge brothers and sisters who ended up as celebrity talking heads on the TV machine blather on in the same way.

But as the high school popularity contest, or should I say "college" popularity contest, has worked its way into the upper echelons of society, I had to wonder:

Lots of rope out there, but I'm not so sure the fraternity pledge-crowd isn't using it on us.

Sources:

Calling a Spade a Spade, Menopausal Stoner blog.

gdaeman_scroll_small

March 14, 2010

Breaking News: Glenn Beck Attacks GDAEman



It has recently been reported on CNNBC that Glenn Beck has taken a swipe at me. As if I care.

See Video Here. (skip the facebook thing)

gdaeman_scroll_small

March 12, 2010

Daily Kos' Marcos Moulitsas Asked to Recant













As you might have heard on the DemocracyNow! daily program, "progressive" blogger Marcos Moulitsas blasted Congressman Dennis Kucinich's principled position on healthcare.

    MARKOS MOULITSAS: [I’m going to hold] people like Dennis Kucinich responsible for the 40,000 Americans that die each year from a lack of healthcare. And I don’t care if you’re a Republican or you’re a conservative Democrat or you’re somebody like Dennis Kucinich. The fact is, this does a heck of a lot for a lot of people. And like I said, it’s not perfect, it definitely needs to be improved, but it’s a first step. And God knows, it’s taken us a long time to even get our toe in the door, given the corporate interests that are arrayed against any kind of real reform. So I think this is a first step. It’s definitely not the end of the path. It’s not the ideal solution. But we are—our foot’s in the door. And if somebody like Kucinich wants to block that, I find that completely reprehensible.

    And he’s elected, not to run for president, which he seems to do every four years. He’s not elected to grandstand and to—and to give us this ideal utopian society. He’s elected to represent the people of his district, and he’s not representing the uninsured constituents in his district by pretending to take the high ground here. What he’s doing, he’s undermining this reform. He’s making common cause with the Republicans. And I think that’s a perfect excuse and a rationale for a primary challenge.

Rep. Kucinich explained his steady principled position, explained that he has not been intransigent and had struck compromises throughout the process. Without showing any angst toward Marcos Moulitsas, and in his steady way, Kucinich explained that the ball remains in play and that tactics are involved that Moulitsas appears not to have considered:

I have a responsibility to take a stand here on behalf of those who want a public option. There’s about thirty-four members of the Senate, at least, who have signed on to saying they support a public option.

If I were to just concede right now and say, “Well, you know, whatever you want. All this pressure’s building. Just forget about it,” actually weakens every last-minute bit of negotiations that would try to improve the bill.

I hope you'll join me in telling Marcos M. of the Daily KOS that you support Kucinch's principled position. Here's what I had to say:
I'd like to register my solidarity with Rep. Dennis Kucinich in his principled stance on healthcare reform. He has enough pressures from the corporate wing of the Democratic Party that he doesn't need to receive it from Marcos Moulitsas.

From a strategic standpoint, we need Kucinich to stand on the end of the lever during these final days and weeks of negotiation.

I think it would be a good tactic for Marocos to publicly recant what he said about Kucinich. It would keep the issue alive, and maybe we'll get something other than a huge stream of dollars to the insurance industry that they will use to lock in the status quo.

For Your Convenience:

Sources:

Thanks to GLH Blog for nudging me to post this.

DemocracyNow!, "Rep. Dennis Kucinich Takes on Democratic Leaders with Insistence on Public Option, Call for Afghan Withdrawal", March 11, 2010.

gdaeman_scroll_small

March 11, 2010

On My Mind March 11

On my mind:

  • Where has honesty gone? A culture of half-truths and down right lies has invaded our TV sets.
  • Common cause on the right and left. Don't trust the federal reserve? Think the bank bailout was an establishment bailout? Find the official 9/11 story to be spurious? Know that torture is Un-American? See through the excuses for going to war in Iraq and lament the profiteering? Then you must be a member of the right wing... no I mean the left wing... err... I'm confused.
gdaeman_scroll_small

March 10, 2010

Public Option Senate Letter

Has your Senator signed on to support the public option for healthcare?

HERE IS THE LIST

Time to raise our mutual voices.

For Your Convenience:
  • Contact the US Senate
  • Contact the House of Representatives

  • Sources:

    gdaeman_scroll_small

    March 7, 2010

    GDAE Podcast - Episode 28

    What Motivates Political Action?
    • Corporate Power: Supreme Court sides with Coal Mine Profits over People.
    • Prosecute Bush: The Chilcot Inquiry into Britain's role in the Iraq war, a window into a US inquiry.
    • MUSIC: Francisco Herrera mixed with poetry, "Casas de Carton"...
    • The Psychology of Motivating Action: Is "more" always better? Research suggests that isn't the case.
    • Experimental psychology: The Gaza Strip test case.
    • Hope: A key ingredient in a person's decision to join a cause.

    Sighted First Robin of the Season Today

        gdaeman_scroll_small

    March 4, 2010

    Release Full British Foreign Office Iraq strategy paper

    Why should we be able to see the entire British Foreign Office Strategy paper on Iraq from November 2000? The British Foreign Office was good enough to explain why:

    "Releasing the paper would make Government more accountable and increase trust," the Foreign Office conceded. "There is public interest in being able to assess the quality of advice being given to ministers and subsequent decision-making."

    According to The Independent of UK, "The strategy paper was commissioned by Sir William Patey (right), then head of Middle East policy at the Foreign Office, ahead of the November 2000 presidential election which brought George Bush to the White House. "

    Thanks to the efforts of The Independent UK, "the Foreign Office eventually agreed to release a redacted version – with the views of the United States and other countries blacked out."

    Lets call for the re-release of a version that shows the views of the Clinton Administration. Lets call on the US State Department to give Britain the OK to do so. Here's my request to the US State Dept.:

    Subject: British November 2000 Strategy Paper on Iraq

    I'm writing to request that the US State Department allow the British Foreign Office to release references to US views in the the November 2000 strategy paper on Iraq that was commissioned by Sir William Patey.

    For further reference, See:
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-warned-in-2000-iraq-war-was-illegal-1914293.html

    Thank You

    For Your Convenience:
    Sources:

    The Independent UK, "Blair warned in 2000 Iraq war was illegal: Secret papers withheld by Chilcot inquiry reveal Foreign Office fears over invasion," March 2, 2010.

    gdaeman_scroll_small

    March 3, 2010

    10 Steps to Start Taking Back Our Republic

    The more interesting ones come at the end of the list...

    1. Secure the Vote (Remove doubts from the voting process)
    2. Expand Voter Participation
    3. Increase Voter Choice with Instant Runoff Voting (Require the winner to have at least 50% of the voting public's support)
    4. Scrap Winner-Take-All Elections (Proportional Representation)
    5. Direct Election of the President
    6. Overhaul the U.S. Senate
    7. Reclaim the Airwaves
    8. Minimize Money's Role
    9. Reform the Supreme Court
    10. Restore Faith in Government of the People.

    Source:

    Steven Hill book, "10 Steps to Repair American Democracy".

    gdaeman_scroll_small

    March 2, 2010

    Noose Tightening for Tony Blair

    It might be true that Britain's Chilcot investigation is toothless, but such inquiries can take on a life of their own. On March 2, The Independent of the UK ran the headline:


    An invasion of Iraq was discussed within the Government more than two years before military action was taken – with the Foreign Office warning that an invasion would be illegal...

    Secret Foreign Office strategy papers drawn up by senior civil servants at the end of 2000 have been obtained by this newspaper and are published for the first time today. The Iraq: future strategy document considers options for dealing with the Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

    The document also calls into question Mr Blair's claim that using troops to bring down Saddam Hussein was only discussed after the 9/11 terror attacks on New York – and will increase pressure on the inquiry to call Mr Blair back to give further public evidence this summer.

    At some point facts emerge that are an existential threat to a government's legitimacy. The potential loss of legitimacy forces the government into an inescapable calculus: Is it worse for the entire government to loose its legitimacy or is it worse to throw a former Prime minister under the bus? The calculus is easy, Tony Blair must be sacrificed for the greater good, for the stability of society that depends on preserving the legitimacy of the government.

    Sources:

    Credit to Ten Percent for drawing this to my attention.

    The Independent UK, "Blair warned in 2000 Iraq war was illegal: Secret papers withheld by Chilcot inquiry reveal Foreign Office fears over invasion," March 2, 2010.

    By Michael Savage, Political Correspondent

    gdaeman_scroll_small

    March 1, 2010

    Tea Baggers Say "No Federal Role in Education"

    It's true. I heard a Tea Party activist say the feds have no role in education; should be a state function only.

    OK, in that case, I'd like to see the elected Teabagger turn back the money that Obama is proposing to direct to the states.

    President Barack Obama will offer $900 million in grants to states and school districts to turn around low-performing schools ...


    When you consider that the $900 million would go very far in helping state and local governments, help maintain jobs prevent further economic stagnation, and only equates to maybe a week of the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, it gives a little perspective to the often simplistic views of the Tea Party hierarchy.

    For Your Convenience:

    Sources:

    gdaeman_scroll_small

    February 28, 2010

    Left Vs Right

    Vocal Tea Party members often turn to historical references to justify their views. Yet, they also seem to have right wing views in support of the "free market" and constitutional rights of corporations. So, my question is, "are Tea Party members for the people or are they for the corporations?" Maybe they actually believe that corporations have the people's best interests at heart? ... as if corporations have hearts.

    Left = government of the people, by the people, for the people

    Right = government of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations.

    Adherents to the right wing reasoning seem to believe that the invisible hand of the free market will make all things good. Under this reasoning, it's in the people's best interest that the Wall Street insiders got phat-rich over the last decade AND got bailed out by the tax payers when their system collapsed. Of course, they argue that the collapse was all Clinton's fault, because he forced mortgage companies to sell houses to the poor.

    Corporations are also "people" according to America's current laws, or at least according to activist judges making America's laws.

    But fear not, slavery was once America's law of the land, and the Supreme Court upheld that law in . Not to be too cynical, history shows we can change the laws of the land. Yes, if we take the multi-generational view of our social struggle, we can envision hope.

    BTW: Hit the "Follow" button to the right :-D

    gdaeman_scroll_small

    February 26, 2010

    How to Make MP3 Clip with GarageBand

    Below is a rudimentary "How To" on making a recording in GarageBand and converting it to an MP3.


    Fire Up Garage Band!


    - Start GarageBand
    - Select "New Project" from list on left
    - highlight "Voice"
    - click "Choose" (lower right corner)
    - Name the project file (default is "my song") ... write down name in case you need to search for the file later. Note: You'll first be creating a garage band formatted file with the .band extension. Then, you'll compress it into an mp3 file, same name with .mp3 extension.
    - Choose where you want it saved
    - click on "Create" (Lower Right Corner)... might take a little time

    Orientation:

    LEFT Panel:
    You should see two tracks identified They are labeled one for "Male Basic" voice, one for Female.

    CENTER Panel:
    Two recording areas run horizonal across the upper part of the screen, with numbers across the top.

    RIGHT Panel:
    You can make different things pop up here, and make them go away to increase size of Center Panel. Upon starting a new project, you'll see Lots of stuff about "real instrument" or "master track."

    Get Rid of Right Panel (this is an ass backward way, but it works):
    - Select "Control" at top screen
    - Select "Show Loop Browser" (It's an on/off toggle.. it will replace the right panel)
    - De-select "Hide loop browser" from "Control" option. Right panel should be gone showing more of the recording area.

    Recording Head:
    The recording runs left to right. You should see a thin RED Vertical Line. It shows location of recording (playback) head. You can move the Red Line by putting the cursor on the little triangle at the top, holding down the track pad button, and dragging right or left. It's default position when starting a new project is all the way to the left.

    Lets Record Something:

    The "active track" label is blue. You can change the active track by clicking on the track ... ust to the right of "Male Basic" (if you click on the "male basic" label, it might prompt you to edit that label, so stay to the right). The Male track is probably already blue as a default when you started, but you can switch between it and Female) (up/down arrows also switch between tracks). We'll ignore the female track, tho if you want, you can delete it by highlighting it (make it active), selecting "Track" at the top of the screen, and scrolling down to select "Delete Track." You can also create "duplicate tracks" from the same drop down menu.

    Highlight the Male Voice Track (it should be blue):
    Talk loudly at your computer... you should see the GREEN volume meter light up a little (pair of horizontal bars). If not, check the volume control horizontal slider on the Track, and the Master Volume slider in the lower right of the screen. (See trouble shooting if you still see no green lighting up... if you're too loud, the green will go into the red area, far right of bar).

    + Record:

    Hit the "R" key on the keyboard and start saying something to the computer. The red horizontal line should start moving to the right, and you should see indication of something being recorded.

    STOP by hitting the Space Bar.

    The recording will look like a purple (or yellow) bar across the top of the recording area.

    + Play back:

    Move the record/play head (red line) back to the beginning (far left).
    Hit the Space Bar ... it should play what you recorded.
    Stop by hitting Space Bar again.

    Basic Editing:


    Note that if you click anywhere on the page, the purple bar will fade... you've de-selected it. Click on the purple bar and it should take on a darker color... it is now selected.

    + Split the Track:

    - Select track (make it dark purple)
    - Move the recording/playback/editing head (Red Line) to some position in the recorded purple area.
    - Select "Edit" from the top of scree,
    - Scroll down to "Split"... it should indicate a split.
    - "De-select" recording, by Clicking anywhere on screen ... recorded track should turn light color (light purple).

    + Selecting multiple split pieces:

    - For future reference, if you have lots of pieces of a track split up, and want to select several of them, select one, hold the Shift Key, and select others.

    + Delete Part of Recording:

    To delete the last half of test recording, select the track to the right of the split (Apple 'T' is a shortcut key combination). It should turn dark purple, while the left part of the track remains light purple. Hit "Delete" and the right part of the track should vanish.

    But, the right part of the recording really isn't gone!

    + Stretching Tracks (My term)

    We'll make the deleted part of the track come back.
    - drag the record/play head out of the way
    - move your cursor to the lower right corner of the remaining track ... you should see what looks like a right square bracket, with tiny arrows indicating you're in the proper position < ] >
    - hold the keypad button down to select, and drag to the right... you should be able to drag all the way to bring back everything you just deleted.

    + MUTE/Unmute: On each track label (male, female) there are some icons running horizontally. One looks like a speaker... when this is highlighted (blue) the track is muted. This is helpful if you work with more than one track, and also controls which tracks are active when exporting (sharing) the final product... sometimes, tracks have raw material from which you're extracting bits.

    Real Recording:

    Do a few tests to be sure you get the hang of it, and the volume is reasonable (not too low or way in the red and distorted). Then record your essay. If you make mistakes, don't worry about editing, unless you want to... just add on re-takes along the same track until you have everything recorded... I can edit it to clean it up. Save periodically (see below).

    Saving:


    Once you've recorded something you like, go to "File" scroll down to "Save"

    Creating a Compressed File to send me by E-mail (Sharing):

    The Garage Band files are not compressed in any way, so they tend to be big relative to an MP3 compression format.

    + Clean up Blank Space: To the right of your recording, there's probably some blank recording space.
    At the bottom of the screen is a slider that allows you to quickly scroll all the way to the right of the recording area. Go there.
    At the top of the screen, among the numbers across the top, you should see a tiny white triangle pointing to the left. Drag that arrow to the left until it is a little way to the right end of your recorded track (purple track)... leave a little dead space.

    Sharing:


    Once you have what you want, and have saved it.
    - Mute the Female Track (just to be safe)... little speaker icon turned blue.
    - Select "Share" at the top of the screen
    - Scroll down to "Send Song to iTunes"

    Don't worry too much about where it will be saved, because you can find it in iTunes in "Most Recent" area.

    - If not already selected, CHECK the "Compress" box.
    - Select "Compress Using" "MP3 Encoder" option (vs the AAC)... I think AAC is a bit bigger file.
    - Select "Audio Setting" select "Custom" & select "Custom" again.
    Set the "bit rate" at 64 kbps (this is fairly low quality, but OK for voice and helps ensure a small file for emailing). Select OK.
    - Click "Share".... It might take a little time to convert the file format (compress & send to iTunes).

    You've Done it! You should now be able to find the file you created in iTunes! In fact, it might actually start playing in iTunes (mine does... I probably need to change a setting so this doesn't happen).

    Check new file in iTunes:

    Go to iTunes
    See "Recently added" under "play lists" you should see the file. If not, search for it.
    When you find it in iTunes, highlight it and click both "apple & the 'i' key"... a pop-up screen will give you a summary of the mp3 file, with file size and other info. You can add info to the MP3 file that goes around with it... my Podcast files are MP3 files to which I attach the GDAE Podcast graphic, and other.... you don't need to do this.

    Copy the iTunes file of your recording to a Directory using Finder for future attaching to e-mail
    (maybe you can attach the file directly from the iTunes, but I've never done that before).

    Open Finder and navigate to a directory where you'd like to save a copy of the mp3 file.

    Change the Finder & iTunes panel sizes & locations so that you can drag & drop the iTunes file to the Finder directory. Once this is done, you're ready to send me an e-mail and attache the mp3 file to it.


    Trouble-shooting:


    The most likely glitch, if any, is that you need to be sure GarageBand knows you're using the internal mic of your mac, not an external mic. I believe the internal mic is the default, and since you've probably never used an external mic, there should be no problem... but if there is... try below.

    Check your microphone to be sure it's set for the internal mic:
    - Open System Preferences (Icon=Gears)
    - Open "Sound" (under "hardware" section...
    - Select "Input" options
    - Select "Built-in" (as opposed to





    For Your Convenience:

    Sources:

    gdaeman_scroll_small

    February 25, 2010

    Speak Out on Health Care

    My message to the White House on the GOP (McCain's) call to "start over":

    If you are forced to "start over with a clean slate" on health care, the administration's initial position should be "medicare for all" or some other single payer system. Then, your compromise can be the inclusion of a public option. The GOP needs to be careful of what it wishes for.

    We all know, having watched "the process," Mr. McCain, that the GOP did not operate in good faith as the healthcare legislation was developed. Republicans used stalling tactics, including disruption of town hall meetings, to try to derail any progress.

    Let your voice be known at the White House on single-payer approach now.

    For Your Convenience:

    gdaeman_scroll_small

    February 21, 2010

    GDAE Podcast - Episode 27

    Populist Movements
    • Bankruptcy: Punished by 2005 Law.
    • Worse than Apartheid: Israel's Roads and Weapons.
    • Prosecution of Bush era Officials: More than a pipe dream... Israeli Officials Feel the Heat.
    • Media-Criticism: Falsehoods on Bush Vs Obama's policies to keep us Safe.
    • MUSIC: Gypsy Jazz.
    • Banksters in Obama Administration: Former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer.
    • Rise of the Right Wing: Prelude to Howard Zinn on American Populist movement.
    Play Episode 26 from this page:

    February 11, 2010

    Challenging Conventional Wisdom

    As you might have noticed, I've been taking on the sanctity of the US Constitution on my "other" blog, Challenge the Establishment.

    I remember, just within the past 4-5 years, that my initial reaction to hearing criticism of the US Constitution was one of discomfort ... Intellectually I could understand the critiques, but I was emotionally socialized to think of the Constitution as being ... exceptional and immutable.

    It takes time to come to grips with challenges to one's bedrock beliefs. But, through repeated exposure to the critiques, through alternative critiques that accumulate into a body of evidence, through dialogue with other humans who are exploring the same path of inquiry, the bedrock can loosen into soil. Over time, as the weight of evidence becomes irrefutable, the soil becomes fertile ground for advancing positive social change.

    The discomfort of challenging deeply held, socialized beliefs never goes away completely, in part because they are so deeply ingrained. But, in addition, by challenging conventional wisdom, you become a minority; facing reactions ranging from apathy to rejection to ridicule to outright hostility.

    Facing the discomfort with the company of others helps. The Program on Corporations, Law and Democracy (POCLAD) Challenging has been bringing humans together on such issues for over a decade. The conventional wisdom about the role of corporations in our society goes hand in hand with challenging myths about the sanctity of the US Constitution.

    I'll be revisiting these topics on this blog, the Challenge the Establishment blog, and on GDAE Podcast in 2010. I invite you to probe these bedrock issues with me.

    Sources:

    gdaeman_scroll_small

    February 9, 2010

    Slavery & Corporations: The Connection

    What's the connection between slavery and corporations? In part, it's about wealth accumulation. It's also about deficiencies in the US Constitution.

    Gotta wonder where the wealth accumulated by Brooke and Hubbard is today.

    READ MORE


    Sources:

    "Challenge the Establishment" blog.

    gdaeman_scroll_small