Surprise surprise, the troop surge has worked so well that we need to delay the troop draw down. This isn't a quagmire, it's an occupation.Now that we know either Clinton, Obabma or McCain will be the next president, we know the US troops will be in Iraq, at some level, for at least nine more years, unless they are pushed out.
My estimate of the length of the occupation is still on track, but I'm not sure I haven't under estimated it.
In my original estimate I used a comparison of Iraq and Vietnam as the basis for estimating six more years from January 2007. Here's another possible basis for an estimate of how long we'll be in Iraq.... Bosnia:
TUZLA, Bosnia, Nov. 24, 2004 -- U.S. troops marked the end of their nine-year peacekeeping role in Bosnia on Wednesday as NATO prepared to hand over the task to the European Union in December.
Ooops! Forgot something:
A small number of U.S. troops will stay in Bosnia to hunt war crime suspects and help the country reform its military.
Sound familiar? Obama and Clinton always say have a similar disclaimer, like those words read really quickly at the end of a damn advertisement:
Thecandidatedoesnotrepresentthisstatementasfact and reservestherighttomaintaintrooplevelstomeetunforseenneeds astheyarise
including butnotlimitedto securityforcontractorsandembassyemployees
trainingiraqiforces interdictingterrorists
So, General Petraeus wants a little time for "consolidation and evaluation," and Defense Secretary Gates "had been kind of headed in that direction as well."
Fear and Worry are all Part of a Crumbling Empire:
Some fear the drawdown could result in giving up some recent security gains while many in the military worry that strains on troops from long and multiple combat tours will grow worse unless the troop reduction continues after July.
If people like Barak Obama have their way, who call for increasing the size of the US Military by 90,000, the latter worry should subside... for a while.
Crumble, crumble.
Sources:
CBC, U.S. may delay troop cuts in Iraq: defence secretary, February 11, 2008.
2 comments:
Very interesting. Our troops would also be refreshed if we stopped lingering in all the other places we shouldn't linger, either.
You and I probably disagree on the Iraq situation, but I think we both agree that our presence is not needed in many of the places it currently exists.
Hey Rick,
Did you catch the news about a Marine report on the failure to send high-end armored vehicles to Iraq? The guy, an officer who spent time in Iraq, is seeing whistle blower protections 'cuz the military is coming down on him.
Yea, we may disagree on Iraq. I see it as part of US imperialism. Like the bumper sticker: "What the Hell is OUR Oil doing under THEIR Sand?"
Post a Comment