So, when I read the headline "Stocks jump on Wells Fargo surprise profit announcement" I'm very suspicious. And we have reason to be.
That's because, you can't trust Congress or the little known Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) either. The FASB may be perpetuating the shell game under pressure from Members of Congress that represent the big financial institutions.
In short, during a hearing of the House Financial Services subcommittee on March 12, FASB chairman Robert Herz was strong-armed to let banks, say Wells Fargo, inflate the value of their assets, with the hammer coming down in this final exchange:
Chairman Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-PA): You do understand the message that we’re sending?
Herz: Yes, I absolutely do, sir.
Here's the way Democrat Kanjorski wants the shell game to be played.
Assigning (Marking) Value to Bank Assets: The value of financial industry assets can be determined in a couple of ways. One way is to let the market determine the value... see what someone will actually pay for the assets. That's known as marking the value of the asset to market (Mark-to-Market).
Another way of assessing value is to create a mathematical model of the value and use that model to mark the asset's value (Mark-to-Model).
Guess which way Kanjorski was pressuring the FASB chairman Herz to let the banks mark their asset values? Mark-to-Model. Tweak the model to assign a little more value to the assets and voila, Wells Fargo "surprisingly" reports a profit.
Bloomberg offers the take from former Lehman Bros. managing director, Robert Willens:
“By letting banks use internal models, instead of market prices, and allowing them to take into account the cash flow of securities, FASB’s change could boost bank industry earnings by 20%.”
Read More Details...
Psssst... Do Something
- Contact the Broadcast Media
- Contact the Newspapers
- Contact the US Senate
- Contact the House of Representatives
Wiskey and Gunpowder, Tomorrow Mark-to-Model Returns with a Vengeance, Samantha Buker, April 1, 2009 (no fool'n).